I use a call to hunt ducks, not stage calling. This would be a great debate at the bar with a beer in hand and a duck call in the other.
Not sure why this thread intrigues me; it just does.
I'm no historian, but I'm quite certain that the duck call originated to call ducks to hunters for food. Probably, many years later, a duck call was used in competition. Now that competition calling is popular, there is a definative line drawn. I respect both sides of that line although I have no desire to call competitvely.
Matt wrote
"I would rather see a customer purchase a single reed and learn to use it."Why this? I would rather have someone purchase a call they can operate efficiently and and be satisfied with regardless of the amount of reeds. A few have posted that they turn customers away if they are seeking a double reed call. I get that to a degree but it appears that folks are talking about double reed duck calls as if they are a nuisance or have no place in the duck hunting community. Perhaps I misunderstood what was being posted or percieved it differently than it was intended? I agree completely with those that have posted about the versatility/ability of a single reed. That said, I disagree that double reed calls are
"a limited call with a crutch so that bad callers can feel good about themselves". Above quote from Marketti
" This would be a great debate at the bar with a beer in hand and a duck call in the other". Probably a good idea and I'd love to join you. This, in my opinion, is where
that line is drawn. I'd like to debate this in a duck blind. At a bar, you'll most likely get competition style calling. In a blind, you'll most likely get the calling style to attract and kill ducks.
Lastly, this is with respect for everyones opinion and preference that posted above.
Mutt